Friday, October 25, 2013


Really, ENOUGH natalist nonsense about Africa. The original caption, by the way, attributed this to "foreign exploitation".

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Financial planning

Schemes after schemes.
The amount of garbage we need to wade through
just to drag on
gets to the nerves.

Why don't they just ban money?

Won't do.
Why don't they just ban life?

Friday, October 11, 2013

The nature of nature

This text is from a Clarence Darrow writing. A friend posted it here, in his blog.

Nothing is so cruel, so wanton, so unfeeling as Nature; she moves with the weight of a glacier carrying everything before her. In the eyes of Nature, neither man nor any of the other animals mean anything whatever. The rock-ribbed mountains, the tempestuous sea, the scorching desert, the myriad weeds and insects and wild beasts that infest the earth, and the noblest man, are all one. Each and all are helpless against the cruelty and immutability of the resistless processes of Nature.
Whichever way man may look upon the earth, he is oppressed with the suffering incident to life. It would almost seem as though the earth had been created with malignity and hatred. If we look at what we are pleased to call the lower animals, we behold a universal carnage. We speak of the seemingly peaceful woods, but we need only look beneath the surface to be horrified by the misery of that underworld.
Hidden in the grass and watching for its prey is the crawling snake which swiftly darts upon the toad or mouse and gradually swallows it alive; the hapless animal is crushed by the jaws and covered with slime, to be slowly digested in furnishing a meal. The snake knows nothing about sin or pain inflicted upon another; he automatically grabs insects and mice and frogs to preserve his life. The spider carefully weaves his web to catch the unwary fly, winds him into the fatal net until paralyzed and helpless, then drinks his blood and leaves him an empty shell. The hawk swoops down and snatches a chicken and carries it to its nest to feed its young. The wolf pounces on the lamb and tears it to shreds. The cat watches at the hole of the mouse until the mouse cautiously comes out, then with seeming fiendish glee he plays with it until tired of the game, then crunches it to death in his jaws. The beasts of the jungle roam by day and night to find their prey; the lion is endowed with strength of limb and fang to destroy and devour almost any animal that it can surprise or overtake.
There is no place in the woods or air or sea where all life is not a carnage of death in terror and agony. Each animal is a hunter, and in turn is hunted, by day and night. No landscape is so beautiful or day so balmy but the cry of suffering and sacrifice rends the air. When night settles down over the earth the slaughter is not abated. Some creatures see best at night, and the outcry of the dying and terrified is always on the wind. Almost all animals meet death by violence and through the most agonizing pain. With the whole animal creation there is nothing like a peaceful death. Nowhere in nature is there the slightest evidence of kindness, of consideration, or a feeling for the suffering and the weak, except in the narrow circle of brief family life.
Man furnishes no exception to the rule. He seems to add the treachery and deceit that the other animals in the main do not practice, to all the other cruelties that move his life. Man has made himself master of the animal world and he uses his power to serve only his own ends. Man, at least, kills helpless animals for the pleasure of killing, alone.
For man himself there is little joy. Every child that is born upon the earth arrives through the agony of the mother. From childhood on, the life is full of pain and disappointment and sorrow. From beginning to end it is the prey of disease and misery; not a child is born that is not subject to disease. Parents, family, friends, and acquaintances, one after another die, and leave us bereft. The noble and the ignoble life meets the same fate.
Nature knows nothing about right and wrong, good and evil, pleasure and pain; she simply acts. She creates a beautiful woman, and places a cancer on her cheek. She may create an idealist, and kill him with a germ. She creates a fine mind, and then burdens it with a deformed body. And she will create a fine body, apparently for no use whatever. She may destroy the most wonderful life when its work has just commenced. She may scatter tubercular germs broadcast throughout the world. She seemingly works with no method, plan or purpose. She knows no mercy nor goodness.
Nothing is so cruel and abandoned as Nature. To call her tender or charitable is a travesty upon words and a stultification of intellect. No one can suggest these obvious facts without being told that he is not competent to judge Nature and the God behind Nature. If we must not judge God as evil, then we cannot judge God as good. In all the other affairs of life, man never hesitates to classify and judge, but when it comes to passing on life, and the responsibility of life, he is told that it must be good, although the opinion beggars reason and intelligence and is a denial of both.
Intellectually, I am satisfied that life is a serious burden, which no thinking, humane person would wantonly inflict on some one else.
Syllable after syllable oozes truth!

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Capital punishment

I responded to this newspaper article on Capital Punishment with a letter to the editor.

Here was the letter I wrote.
First of all, I loathe violence. I also consider vengeance a crude biological instinct people should triumph upon rather than a divine quest for justice. That said, there is still a distinction between provoked and unprovoked violence: between communal riots and what happened in the Delhi bus.
Now, it really puzzles me when people talk of death sentence as though it is the supreme form of violence. For example, the usage of "wanting blood" for wanting capital punishment. What's so "bloody" about a death sentence? I mean, we don't stone criminals to death, draw and quarter them, lock them in the brazen bull or use Scaphism as execution methods these days. Of course, there are now methods more humane than hanging which we should consider switching to.
In any case, a judicial death sentence only advances the death sentence already imposed when a person's parents decided to launch a pregnancy and carry it to term.
The government is to ensure such violence (I refer to crimes, not the sentences) doesn't recur. Given the precedent, the perpetrators need to be restrained for the rest of their lives. And longer the life, greater the expense of restraining them. So why should it be prolonged indefinitely?

This is what actually came on the paper:
I loathe violence. I consider vengeance a crude biological instinct. That said, there is a distinction between provoked and unprovoked violence — between communal riots and what happened in Delhi last year.

However, I think the following is the most crucial part.
In any case, a judicial death sentence only advances the death sentence already imposed when a person's parents decided to launch a pregnancy and carry it to term.
As someone who recognizes the hypocrisy of human rights people in condemning judicial death sentences while recognizing imposing the original death sentence as a "human right", I sometimes feel could shriek my lungs into shreds in protest.